Ezio
Veteran
It always depends on the outcome if you don't care about the juries or not.
I wanted to crucify juries too in 2016, but I am glad they are here.
I wanted to crucify juries too in 2016, but I am glad they are here.
Participants who dont care about the Juries should be excluded from the Competition from the Beginning.
It was an interview after the final in which he said, he doesn't care if juries voted them low, important to him is that so many televoters voted for them that they might even have a chance to exist after the ESC. They plan a tour in Europe (maybe).
I think it's okay to say that.
Of course I am disappointed in the juries this year. I loved our entry, and had it top 3 (which doesnt often happen). I loved their live performance. I expected KEIINO to do better in the televotings than with the juries. I did not see them winning the televotes though. But I sure didnt see them coming in 16th with the juries either. This was not a joke entry, and the vocals were spot on, and at least I found the live performance to be very tasty.
So what was it that made the juries put this so low? The age of the jury members? Or a negative bias within the juries that "we are here to stop "fun" entries? I reallly dont know...
But even so, I do think the juries should stay on. And at least this proves to me that the juries are not pro/contra countries (at least not in most cases); rather they are pro/contra certain type of songs. Norway has been saved by juries before; Both Silent Storm and A Monster Like Me were pushed into top 10 by the juries.
don't be insane. you know there are participants who don't care about juries or televotes or anything, right? i find it normal and healthy that michal didn't care about the jury and we should encourage people like him.Participants who dont care about the Juries should be excluded from the Competition from the Beginning.
Of course I am disappointed in the juries this year. I loved our entry, and had it top 3 (which doesnt often happen). I loved their live performance. I expected KEIINO to do better in the televotings than with the juries. I did not see them winning the televotes though. But I sure didnt see them coming in 16th with the juries either. This was not a joke entry, and the vocals were spot on, and at least I found the live performance to be very tasty.
So what was it that made the juries put this so low? The age of the jury members? Or a negative bias within the juries that "we are here to stop "fun" entries? I reallly dont know...
But even so, I do think the juries should stay on. And at least this proves to me that the juries are not pro/contra countries (at least not in most cases); rather they are pro/contra certain type of songs. Norway has been saved by juries before; Both Silent Storm and A Monster Like Me were pushed into top 10 by the juries.
Because the song is cheap as hell
I think both and were kinda cheapPersonally I don’t understand what makes our song supposedly cheap but «She Got Me» not but hey different opinions
I don’t think any of those songs are cheap
I mean top five is "something"
i mean it's top ten
top five
top three
winner
no one says top six