True, but broadcaster see the results of the few daring to do so, and with that knowledge they won't risk it
Well to add insult to the injury, the lack of Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia didn't help matters...
I'm torn about this matter, like I said a million times. Disapprove full televoting, yet I don't agree 100% with the juries because of the potential trashing of certain entries (on purpose? we will never know).
I'm curious to see if we come back (I hope we won't) what will be aproach towards ESC..hmmm..will it be in English this time? :?
I guess that if your country stuck with your national language so far, it's because (thankfully) you won with "Molitva".
Otherwise, I'm pretty sure you would have at least tried once to send something in English like your neighbours.
So maybe it's time to return to the top 10 rankings combined system (pre-2013) then? I don't know which is the best situation
Sweden did indeed sound like a standard Eurovision ballad, Ukraine had 2 sec of ethnic elements and that was it, Russian entry VERY Russian? I guess Norway was the only "different" in the top. 10 (maybe not a Norwegian sound, but atleast something different from the standard... however it could have been a British entry aswell).
[MENTION=9441]RainyWoods[/MENTION]
Yeah I know Dragana is already chosen, I know, I know..
Funny thing is that Dragana actually lives in Wien more than 15 years!
Sweden did indeed sound like a standard Eurovision ballad, Ukraine had 2 sec of ethnic elements and that was it, Russian entry VERY Russian? I guess Norway was the only "different" in the top. 10 (maybe not a Norwegian sound, but atleast something different from the standard... however it could have been a British entry aswell).
Major rivalry exists between Scandinavian and ex-Soviet bloc states.
After the crumbling of the Balkan voting bloc in 2013, the two dominant voting blocs, the Scandinavian bloc and ex-Soviet bloc, attempt to destroy each other in this year’s contest – using both their national juries and televoters. Very few points were exchanged between the two voting blocs. As you can see below, both Scandinavian juries and televoters were anything but generous with their points.
While Austria decisively won the contest, several countries’ juries tried hard to derail Conchita’s victory. Those countries were Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Montenegro, and Poland. However, televoters disagreed with their juries. Austria was ranked second in the Armenian televoting, third in the Azeri televoting, forth in the Belarussian and Polish televoting, and fifth in the Montenegrin televoting. If the EBU scrapped the jury in this year’s contest, Austria would have won with 315 points based on the televoting only.
They juries of Scandinavia and ex-Soviet Union tried to kill each other's success....
Also interesting:
Politics, rivalry, coercion: Eurovision 2014 voting results
I love how everyone is talking like Conchita is sent from heaven and deserved all 12's, but no one seems to be bothered by what for instance the UK and Irish juries PURPOSLY did to Poland for instance... as always double standards where western/nordic countries can do "no wrong" but all blame for corruption and flawed voting are put at eastern ones. Maybe some didn't vote for a drag in beard and listened to the dated song he performed instead
I love how everyone is talking like Conchita is sent from heaven and deserved all 12's, but no one seems to be bothered by what for instance the UK and Irish juries PURPOSLY did to Poland for instance... as always double standards where western/nordic countries can do "no wrong" but all blame for corruption and flawed voting are put at eastern ones. Maybe some didn't vote for a drag in beard and listened to the dated song he performed instead