Sweden/Scandinavia are the powerhouses of pop music, a lot of the hits we hear on an everyday basis are written by norwegians/swedes and basically, that's what they send to the ESC. That's a no brainer for me why they're performing so well with jurors even when I don't like the songs (2015, 2016,2020 for example).
This year was special as well as she basically was the only candidate for the jury win and as others stated, she could have gotten even more points. Italy wasn't on the radar of the bubble and they reached top 5, it tells a lot about the opponents of Sweden yesterday. Marco deserved 100% its score in my opinion but the fact we didn't think about Due Vite as a jury contender is because the song wasn't really popular for a reason, it was just not in the majority's taste.
I don't get why not having a single televote 12pts is a problem. Like being second in a lot of countries (8 to be precise and also 8 eights) is pretty good and as we don't know the volumes we can't say if there was a huge gap between the first and the second in any given country.
Basically if there's 2000 people voting for Finland and 1895 for Sweden.. it's kinda the same to me ? but one got 12 and the other 10. That could also be 2000 and 1000 as well, bigger or lesser numbers. Finland totally smashed the televote though and rightfully so as it was tailored for the audience but having a strong set of 10pts as Sweden had is great as well. People liked Tattoo, they voted for it too.