Contact us

EUROVISION 2023 - FINAL REHEARSALS AND LIVE SHOW DISCUSSION

Grinch

Well-known member
Joined
March 13, 2011
Posts
9,364
Before I say anything else I'll have you know Loreen wasn't even in my top 5 so I say this because I'm sick of hearing it every year, not cause I am some sort of fanboy.

Anyway, I wish people could stop this. Trying to claim that she's not worthy or this being "not ok" is cringe af, people act like whiny kids. Not having your favorite win or getting annoyed by Sweden frequently being favored by the jury does not make her unworthy. Many try to frame it as a jury problem but I bet you half of the people complaining wouldn't be mad if the roles were reversed and Finland won with jury votes.

Finland was 4th with the juries. How can you claim they got "screwed over by juries"? Loreen was 2nd with the public vote and yet it's somehow unworthy? Give me a break. I would understand your frustration if Loreen was very unpopular with the public but won the jury vote, but this was absolutely not the case. At the end of the day, the jury system is what Eurovision has always used and it's part of the core concept. The victory is deserved cause Loreen did well in both parts of the voting, saying it's not is just nonsense.

That being said, I do think 50% of the votes belonging to the jury is too much and I wish they would change it to 1/3 instead. And I actually did prefer Cha Cha Cha over Tattoo, but my main favorites were Austria and Australia!
:fi: was screwed over because they won TV, tons and tons of people chose that song as the winner and yet just because a bunch of biased juries favored :se: AS ALWAYS, :fi: lost.

We don't complain about jury giving less or more points to :fi:. We want jury not be existing anymore.

No jury. 100% televote.
 

LakZaNokte

Well-known member
Joined
March 8, 2011
Posts
8,884
The fact that jury votes are presented first and for a much longer period of time says it all. Jury votes are presented as more important and televoting as something completely secondary. The whole voting system should be changed. I am for 100% televoting.
It’s like it is pretty much up to juries and “oh, ok, let’s see what the actual wievers think too, if we really have to”.

And also, most of the juries consist of various random people from respective media. Radio hosts, ex talent show participants, washed-up songwriters etc. Yeah, really important opinions.
 

Loindici

Veteran
Joined
June 5, 2019
Posts
3,632
Location
Bejba
Finland is trending here in Indonesian Twitter.

In Indonesia. Out of all places.
 

Ezio

Veteran
Joined
January 29, 2017
Posts
7,353
Location
Loin d'ici
:fi: was screwed over because they won TV, tons and tons of people chose that song as the winner and yet just because a bunch of biased juries favored :se: AS ALWAYS, :fi: lost.

We don't complain about jury giving less or more points to :fi:. We want jury not be existing anymore.

No jury. 100% televote.
We need juries, but without bias and affiliation towards without record labels. No record label "colleague" should vote for another. What are the compliance rules and where is the oversight?
 

Grinch

Well-known member
Joined
March 13, 2011
Posts
9,364
We need juries, but without bias and affiliation towards without record labels. No record label "colleague" should vote for another. What are the compliance rules and where is the oversight?
Nope, we don't need juries. Whatever public likes and supports, that's the winner.

Votes from 6 people ≠ votes from thousands of people
 

Ezio

Veteran
Joined
January 29, 2017
Posts
7,353
Location
Loin d'ici
Nope, we don't need juries. Whatever public likes and supports, that's the winner.

Votes from 6 people ≠ votes from thousands of people
Yeah, whatever, let's get rid off them. We would do worse but then we also get rid off Sweden riggory soon.
 

midnightsun

Veteran
Joined
February 26, 2016
Posts
3,927
Location
Germany
Juries HAVE to go even if it means we have lots and lots of neighbour voting then. Countries without neighbours have to be better then!

Juries have been proven wrong on so many levels the past years.

a) Some countries are often favoured by juries! Sweden, Malta and also Australia! I was happy for Australia tonight (I voted for them myself!) and they deserved it but in the past they have been overrated and this time, the fear of SBS leaving Eurovision and not knowing about their fate generated some extra points. Like I said, just a fact, not that I was unhappy about hehe

b) some countries are always underrated. Norway has been tanked by the juries for the 4th time in a row, also Moldova 2022, Croatia 2023 etc. Why aren’t juries allowed to vote for fun songs? Ridiculous. They don’t even vote for sophisticated or artsy songs either, otherwise they would have rewarded Serbia more!

c) they should prevent bloc voting but the only ones voting massively for their neighbours were the juries… again (we had that in the past years)

d) they just vote mostly accordingly to the odds… France and Spain extreme fan flops in the televote… but high in the odds. Norway the only exception. For 4 years in a row now. Even 5 I think, didn’t they tank Rybak 2018 as well or was it the public?
 

Verjamem

Well-known member
Joined
March 11, 2013
Posts
3,984
During jury voting, we've seen some potential cooperations between Poland and few other countries.

Can't wait for semifinal's results, how much we exchanged with Romania xcoffee
 

Jokuc

Well-known member
Joined
February 28, 2014
Posts
26
The place doesn't matter. The gap in points is all. Sweden was massively favored by juries with hundreds of points more than the second place making televoting practically invalid.
What do you mean invalid? The televotes changed the ranking order of multiple countries, just look at Norway, it has a big impact. If Sweden got 0 by the tele votes then Finland would have won. It sounds to me like the issue here is just with you not accepting jury votes as a valid score. You could say the same about the opposite. I didn't see anyone call the jury votes "invalid" when public vote made Måneskin win in 2021.
 
Joined
April 10, 2021
Posts
3,266
Im still viscerally angry at Selma not winning Eurovision 1999 an event that happened when I was three years old, people never calm down

I still remember Norway's and Sweden's plot from 2001 to officially file request for deducting points from Croatia on technical irregularity, so that Croatia can't win.

I have never voted for Sweden or Norway since and never ever would I. 🤣
 

Ajeje Brazorf

Well-known member
Joined
October 6, 2021
Posts
1,399
I‘m mad a f about these results. These are the worst results since I started watching in 2011. I‘m especially wtf about :ee: and :it:.

Nothing more to say. Didn’t feel any joy today at the voting, it was the most boring voting ever. See you next year.

You really are "wtf" about the only two classic ballads of the year? You know, not all the viewers and jurors of Eurovision are uptempo lovers. Sometimes you need some songs like Estonia and Italy too, because an all ballady Eurovision may be boring, but an all uptempo will be too. I'm honestly not surprised they did well, expecially with the Juries, because they stood out in a mix of "in your face" performances.
 
Top Bottom