there you again, another note for me. being labeled arrogant does not sound like an insult to me at all. It is still an (ineffective) ad hominem attack and a contradiction to the things you wouldn’t do.
You said "Everyone who comes out after me to attack me ad hominem because she or he happens to disagree, I will invite to my ignore list for my own amusement."
I said I didn't come after you because I disagreed, but because this is a very arrogant statement, implying a certain degree of disgust. You then get stuck on the point that I attack you for being arrogant but it is not because of your opinions, but because of your conduct. Given the quote at hand here I would say it's perfectly qualified. None of what I said is contradictory in any way. This is why I doubt your ability to read. It's not as if I have been lacking in clarity.
If things are not clear by now I don't know what to say or do. As this is all off topic this is the last thing I will say about the matter.