Ezio
Veteran
Ahh yes remember the soulful songs like2016
2002
2001 so much passion so much soul Oh wait.
Sorry to burst your bubble but the televoters often times don't vote for the song which is why during the 2004-2008 period there was a over reliance on stage performances since grabbing attention was more important than having a good song.
And also in some countries the televoters make up just about 1% of the viewers so leaving the audience disengaged makes no sense since viewers who don't vote make up the majority of the audience and because of that interest of the contest have gone up not down since the reintroduction of the jury. if it wasn't for the jury last year the soulful and genuine 1944 would have lost to the plastic and dated You're the only one. I'm not saying that the jury ion its current form is perfect but they have already shown that they are a necessity.
There is no need for bursting bubbles, because it would be slightly impolite.
Anyway, 2016 Russia and then all the way back to 2002? I assume we had 14 great televote winners in a row then?
Russia 2016 gave a very entertaining, dramatic and enjoyable performance. Sergey was very charismatic too. Those treadmills and suits don't compare to that. Of course juries have to take away the fun of Eurovision, that is why they were introduced in the first place. Reduce the valuation of songs without factoring in the joy and emotions it may arouse in the audience.
Australia though was a perfect example for overrated plastic by juries. No fun, no emotion, but an awful lot of points for showing off some notes and holograms. 1944 is an example how to win ESC by violating the rules and getting away with it. The message is the problem, not the song which is fine. And people did not get the subliminal message or did not care.
And 2016 was the year of Michal Szpak who gave a rousing performance and touched hearts across Europe, but not across juries. On the other hand Malta's plastic pop was only loved by juries.
2002 was a terrible contest with solely consisted of awful songs and failing favourites. And I was rooting for Latvia that night as well, not knowing that this meant the beginning of the circus that plagued Eurovision going forward. Due to the lack of emotional masterpieces people voted for the entertainment, their neighbours or their diaspora.
And 2001? I do not know what the winner should statistically represent, it is fluke. I missed the contest because we did not qualify.