ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 145
And if we believe Crystal Ball (and they have been quite accurate lately), heats 2 and 3 will be even more tragic.
UMK and even MGP Norway have surpassed Melodifestivalen lately (in terms of quality).
Please dont exaggerate. Even though might have had a bad Day in their Life, they are still the nordic Powerhouse.
and might have a good run, but theres still a long Way to go.
Please dont exaggerate. Even though might have had a bad Day in their Life, they are still the nordic Powerhouse.
and might have a good run, but theres still a long Way to go.
Like I say every year, you can subjectively dislike the Melfest songs or whatever, fact is that the Swedish music industry is very pop-based and thus based on topping charts. Based on that fact Melfest is doing really well, as the lowest number of streams for a finalist last year was 3.1 million and the highest is 44 million (Spotify alone). Sure, Melodifestivalen used to be a little more unique and crazy 10 years ago, but I can't complain when there's (subjectively) good pop music being presented
The problem with Melodifestivalen is glaringly obvious for anyone to see.
It has turned into a closed circlejerk where the same 5 or 6 people get invited to basically compose and produce all the 28 entries year after year after year. And those entries are always given to the same set of 30 artists or so that take turns competing every couple of years.
And to makes thing worse, those same 5/6 composers all produce the same type of music that belongs to the same closed set of accepted genres. Add to that the fact that the 10% or so of different and original artists/composers that get invited each year are obviously told to modify their usual style to fit with what is expected of MF, instead of being able to do their own genuine stuff, and 90% of the songs end up sounding like each other.
It's insane how they receive upwards of 2000 entries every year, more than double that of the 2nd NF that receives more songs, and it's all so stale and somehow the same team of composers ends up being selected to write 70% of entries every year. It's literally impossible that there hasn't been better proposals by different people over the years.
The whole thing reeks of nepotism. Or not exactly nepotism, but you have to be in the closed circuit of people jerking off SVT and the Melfest producers in order to have a shot at being invited into the competition.
And the result of this is becoming more and more obvious as each year passes by - these composers are getting outdated and out of touch with what is actually popular, not only at Eurovision but also at the Swedish market overall. And they just don't have the creative juice to keep manufacturing 39485495 good songs every year in generic forced songwriting camps.
This trend will only change if one of two things happen: The ratings and popularity of MF absolutely plummet and/or a NQ at Eurovision happens. SVT really deserves a NQ to get a kick up their arse and to shift things around in the Melodifestivalen format before it's too late, like what happened in the early 2010s.
Thank you, I don't think I've heard that word before but it's pretty much what I was trying to saySpot on!
And yes, the correct word for it is cronyism and it's very much what Melodifestivalen is.
Ofc there’s outdated shit in Melfest. That’s like the whole point of it almost. It’s ”folkligt” - it builds on what people already love and consume in a broad sense. You think it was the platform for fresh music in 2005? lolWhy are you misleading our foreign friends again?
Sweden is a Pop powerhouse sure, but trust me guys the Swedish music scene isn't reflected well in Melodifestivalen and hasn't been like forever, at least back in the day Melodifestivalen was its own little Schlager bubble and added something to our scene, these days it is just a dated Pop fest and has little to do with how our music scene looks like, nor does it add anything to it.
There is difference between Pop and Pop.
Hence I wrote that it always been dated (compared to current music trends at least), BUT the difference back then is that Melodifestivalen at least had its own niche within the Swedish music scene and dated or not, the quality was also higher, so it served some purpose. I can't say it's the same now...Ofc there’s outdated shit in Melfest. That’s like the whole point of it almost. It’s ”folkligt” - it builds on what people already love and consume in a broad sense. You think it was the platform for fresh music in 2005? lol
I don't expect Melodifestivalen to invent the wheel, and I am even fine with it being its own little odd bubble on the Swedish music scene, but then it needs to bring something to the table. I would of course prefer it to be more aligned with what the Swedish music scene actually looks like as we later on send songs to Eurovision that at least on paper ought to be a representation of our music.I think plenty of Melfest finalists reflect modern pop music. Maybe not Beyoncé or Harry Styles but it’s like siblings of Ava Max and P!nk etc. I don’t think Hold Me Closer, I Can’t Get Enough, Voices, Every Minute, Jag Behöver Inte Dig Idag or Bulletproof were unmodern songs in any way. Then there’s been songs ahead of it’s time like Loreen’s Euphoria or Jenny Silver’s Need A Place To Stay