ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 145
When I say the population isn't on board I mean nothing is done to get them remotely interested in it. Tali's song isn't played on any of our radios (a part from RTL, occasionally - and RTL is not the most popular radio), Luxembourg's Arts Council (very active in general, including on social media) doesn't talk about Eurovision or Tali, and when a rare article in published in the media, comments are negative about ESC and about the way RTL didn't live up to what they promised and favoured "international" composers, producers, etc. instead of Luxembourgish ones.What do you mean when you say the population is not on board? Why not? Is it because of low song quality in the NF or something else?
I hope so, but we've changed governments very recently and I'm not sure they'll be willing to hand out one million euros to RTL (again, a non-public broadcaster) every year if they carry on like this. Actually, I hope they won't.This is permanent. Luxembourg is here to stay. They won't be as classic Luxembourg used to be however.
One's position in the odds to win is not very informative for lower positions, because we are talking very small numbers. Denmark and Luxembourg both have very similar odds across the markets (lower than 0.5%) and the only relevant information you can take from those is "neither is going to win". Establishing order for near impossible events and then drawing conclusions from the order of those probabilities doesn't make much sense in this case.Just to name an example of how uneven the two semis are: Luxembourg is currently 5th in the odds for semi-final 1, while Denmark is 11th in the odds for semi-final 2. But in the overall ranking, Denmark is six places OVER Luxembourg. It's quite remarkable.
(I don't know if we have a mathematician in this forum, but it's hardly within the borders of likelihood, is it ...? (Given that the overall ranking corresponds to a popularity contest, and the odds in the semis represent the actual results.))
Thanks.One's position in the odds to win is not very informative for lower positions, because we are talking very small numbers. Denmark and Luxembourg both have very similar odds across the markets (lower than 0.5%) and the only relevant information you can take from those is "neither is going to win". Establishing order for near impossible events and then drawing conclusions from the order of those probabilities doesn't make much sense in this case.
The odds for semifinals are for qualification, which is a lot more significant, because the probabilities are much higher. Even countries that are last in these odds have a fair chance (>10%). To put things into perspective, every single country has a higher probability of qualifying than Croatia (current n°2) has of winning. So here, comparisons make more sense.
Overall, it's a nice coincidence, but not with much meaning. It would be more telling if we had most of odds favourites in one semi.
I prefer this to the useless revamp, honestlyHer voice shines through in this version… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO3dxa0a29U