Contact us

Carrie (2013)

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
Carrie is an upcoming 2013 American supernatural horror film. It is the third film adaptation of Stephen King's 1974 novel of the same name, and a remake of Brian De Palma's 1976 film of the same name, although it will more closely follow the plot of the novel.

Directed by: Kimberly Peirce
Written by: Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa
Starring: Chloë Grace Moretz, Julianne Moore, Judy Greer, Portia Doubleday, Alex Russell, Gabriella Wilde and Ansel Elgort

Synopsis: The quiet suburb of Chamberlain, Maine is home to the deeply religious and conservative Margaret White and her daughter Carrie. Carrie is a sweet but meek outcast whom Margaret has sheltered from society. Gym teacher Miss Desjardin tries in vain to protect Carrie from local mean girls led by the popular and haughty Chris Hargenson, but only Chris' best friend, Sue Snell, regrets their actions. In an effort to make amends, Sue asks her boyfriend, high school heartthrob Tommy Ross to take Carrie to prom. Pushed to the limit by her peers at the dance, Carrie unleashes telekinetic havoc.

Official Trailer
 

Nikkita

Active member
Joined
October 2, 2012
Posts
1,212
Location
Izmir,Turkey
This will be the first horror movie that i'll watch on cinema,i guess.
I JUST LOVE CARRIE! especially the blood bath scene :D and i'm scared of almost everything,but except this movie.
 

Nicholas123

Well-known member
Joined
February 7, 2013
Posts
8,568
Location
Athens & Kordavian Islands
I'm a huge fan of horror movies...

De Palmas "Carrie" is one of my most favorite!

Although i'm against of making a remake of such a classic movie, i must admit that the trailer seems promising and the choice of Julianne Moore as the religious mother of Carrie is ideal!

Let's wait and see...
 

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
I'm a huge fan of horror movies...

De Palmas "Carrie" is one of my most favorite!

Although i'm against of making a remake of such a classic movie, i must admit that the trailer seems promising and the choice of Julianne Moore as the religious mother of Carrie is ideal!

Let's wait and see...

Oh, I agree! Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie gave outstanding performances in the 1976 film. However, despite being a horror cult classic, the film itself lacked any character development and strayed away from the original source - the book! Kimberly Pierce said that the film will be a new adaptation of the book, but it will also include a few "tributes" to the 1976 film and some new twists to the story. As someone who is against horror remakes, I personally think that "Carrie" needed the reboot. Yes, there was the horrible 2002 television film and the embarrassing 1999 sequel "The Rage: Carrie 2" - both of which we are trying so desperately to forget. But I think it's best that "Carrie" is getting remade for a new generation. I mean the percentage of bullying has risen the past couple of years. How many bullied victims felt defenceless and ended up committing suicide? I think "Carrie" is the best film for those who feel "lost" and I think Carrie will be some kind of a hero for them. Not that I'm suggesting that they should go on a Columbine massacre and shoot everyone.... I just think that "Carrie" is an excellent film as to how far some bullied victims can go. And in regards to the new film, this is just the first trailer to build up the anticipation... the FX/CGI is still in progress and will be "fixed" before the second trailer is released prior to the official premier of the film.
 

Nicholas123

Well-known member
Joined
February 7, 2013
Posts
8,568
Location
Athens & Kordavian Islands
Oh, I agree! Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie gave outstanding performances in the 1976 film. However, despite being a horror cult classic, the film itself lacked any character development and strayed away from the original source - the book! Kimberly Pierce said that the film will be a new adaptation of the book, but it will also include a few "tributes" to the 1976 film and some new twists to the story. As someone who is against horror remakes, I personally think that "Carrie" needed the reboot. Yes, there was the horrible 2002 television film and the 1999 sequel "The Rage: Carrie 2" - both we are trying so desperately to forget. But I think it's best that "Carrie" is getting remade for a new generation. I mean the percentage of bullying has risen the past couple of years. How many bullied victims felt defenceless and ended up committing suicide? I think "Carrie" is the best film for those who feel "lost" and I think Carrie will be some kind of a hero for them. Not that I'm suggesting that they should go on a Columbine massacre and shoot everyone.... I just think that "Carrie" is an excellent film as to how far some bullied victims can go. And in regards to the new film, this is just the first trailer to build up the anticipation for the premier. The FX/CGI is still in progress and will be "fixed" before the second trailer is released prior to the premier of the film.

Yeah, that!!! They both sucked!
King's books are so difficult to become movies. I think that despite the lack of character's development, De Palma did a good job.
The new version seems refreshing. I cannot wait to go to watch it on screen!
 

AdelAdel

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Posts
15,401
Location
Poland
Being a fan of the original movie, I don't have high expectations for the remake. Usually, remakes of classics aren't very good and feel like they were forced to make them. My opinion is that if the original is good, there's no need to remake it just for the sake of remaking. If the remake of "Carrie" is gonna be similar to the remake of "Psycho", then no thanks.
 

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
Being a fan of the original movie, I don't have high expectations for the remake. Usually, remakes of classics aren't very good and feel like they were forced to make them. My opinion is that if the original is good, there's no need to remake it just for the sake of remaking. If the remake of "Carrie" is gonna be similar to the remake of "Psycho", then no thanks.

The original film didn't stay faithful to the novel... it was more of a one dimensional film and didn't have any character development.
 

AdelAdel

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Posts
15,401
Location
Poland
The original film didn't stay faithful to the novel... it was more of a one dimensional film and didn't have any character development.

Didn't have any character development? :lol: From what I remember, the two main characters had their personalities developed enough. But of course I didn't read the book, so I can't really compare.
 

Nicholas123

Well-known member
Joined
February 7, 2013
Posts
8,568
Location
Athens & Kordavian Islands
The problem with King's books is that they are HUGE. So each director has to cut off a lot from the story.
Even Kubrick's "The shining" transmitted about 1/3 of the book on th screen.
 

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
Are you ready for prom, everyone?

carrie-poster05.jpg
 

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
Diu u guyz like the movie? Cause i have to say that i was slightly dissapointed :?

Here's my review that I posted on Facebook...

Tonight, I had the opportunity to watch the advance screening of the new film adaptation of Stephen King's novel, "CARRIE". At first I was somewhat disappointed that it wasn't as faithful to the Stephen King novel as I hoped it would have been, but that's to be expected when you've been a devoted fan of the novel for almost ten years. After watching it on the big screen tonight, I can confidentially say that it definitely stands on its own as a solid film. My only disappointment is the running time of the theatrical cut. The pacing is good and quick, but it felt as though it could have been longer to flesh out the characters and tell the story properly. I do know for a fact that a lot of scenes were filmed, but were dropped from the theatrical cut during the editing process. Kimberly Peirce said in a interview that the original cut of the film was longer and a lot different than what we saw in theatres. I just hope the studios release a 'Director's Cut' on DVD and Blu-ray sometime down the track.

Chloe Grace Moretz (Carrie White) and Julianne Moore (Margaret White) give a solid performance and make their leading characters their own. Judy Greer (Miss Desjardin), Ansel Elgort (Tommy Ross), Gabriella Wilde (Sue Snell), Alex Russell (Billy Nolan) and Portia Doubleday (Chris Hargensen) give a solid performance and make their secondary characters their own. Director Kimberly Peirce does an excellent job focusing on the mother and daughter relationship, as well as the bullying aspect of the story. Composer Marco Beltrami delivers an incredible score which is hauntingly beautiful and unique in its own way. Cinematographer Steve Yedlin does a phenomenal job with the visuals throughout the film. There are a lot of scenes that are psychologically disturbing and emotionally moving -- it definitely makes you feel for Carrie. Even though there are a number of similarities to Brian De Palma's 1976 film, I do believe that Kimberly Peirce's film captured the true essence of the Stephen King novel.

I know a lot of people will disagree with me, but I personally don't see "Carrie" as a typical Horror story. Having a final jump scare just diminishes the point of the story. It cheapens it. Since it's more of a character-driven story, I see it as a Drama (maybe Thriller?) with elements of Horror. Yes, Stephen King's work is known as "Horror" or "Thriller", but the story of Carrie just doesn't fit into the Horror genre by today's standards. Lawrence D. Cohen and Brian De Palma took the novel and turned it into a generic Horror film. I think that's why a lot of people have classified the story as "Horror" -- it's implanted in their mind. If you dissect the novel layer by layer, you will see that it's a tragedy culminating to a horrific event. And what's scary is the realism of the story: religious fanaticism, sexuality, bullying, abuse, revenge, etc. How many incidents have we seen in the past where people, who have been abused, take matters into their own hands after being pushed too far? It's a timeless story that fits in any era.

Do I believe that it was necessary for the story to have been re-adapted for a new generation? Yes. Today, bullying has become a major issue in our society, especially on social media. Take a look at the school shootings and teenage suicides that has occurred over the years. Remember the Columbine massacre that happened in 1999? Two boys were treated as outcasts by their high school peers and in the end they were hellbent on revenge. The same thing applies with Carrie White. Yes, it may be a fictional story of a girl with telekinetic powers, but it does make you stop and think. She was an outcast at school who was regularly tormented by her peers. She suffered emotional and physical abuse from her overly religious mother. And in the end... it was a tragedy. I just hope people take heed of the dangers of bullying and understand that a person can only be pushed so far before they break.

I genuinely believe that "CARRIE" stands alone as a solid film and highly recommend that people watch this with an open mind. The 1976 film was a horror, this is a tragedy.If you want to illegally download the film, I thought I should let you know that there's at least ten minutes of footage missing from the bootleg version that is available online. So yeah...

"CARRIE" is released in theatres right across Australia on November 28.
 

HabaHaba

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Posts
436
UPDATE!
Here's a bit of information regarding the film...

Having read the original screenplay by Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa, I can safely say that the original script didn't follow the same structure as the 1976 film. Yes, there were a few homages here and there, but it was a whole new take on the story. Before the film was delayed in January 2013, there was a lot of positive feedback from those who attended the first test screenings in December 2012. A number of people confirmed that the original cut was longer and a lot different than the theatrical cut. I remember watching a video on YouTube where two guys reviewed the film (without giving away spoilers) based on what they saw at the test screenings. They confirmed that the film was a lot different to Brian De Palma's film and was more closer to the Stephen King novel. I personally believe that the studios interfered with the editing of the film. The theatrical cut wasn't what Kimberly Peirce wanted to release in theatres. It's like they re-cut the film and gave us a remake of Brian De Palma's film. I knew it wasn't Kimberly's voice in the movie -- it was the studios.

A friend of mine, who is a filmmaker, gave their two cents as to what might have happened...

The original cut was all ready to go in March, then the studios looked at the release date and thought they could make more money on "Carrie" during the Halloween season. So they demanded re-shoots to make it more Horror. Re-edits to make it a generic Horror film. Push it out at Halloween to make a quick buck. It would explain why the writer of the 1976 film was credited after the 2013 film was delayed -- they re-shot a lot of scenes from the 1976 screenplay. Obviously a Halloween release would sound appropriate for the film, but it would have involved a lot of re-editing to fit the running time. The downside to the re-shoots and re-edits is that a lot of scenes would have to be dropped or trimmed to fit the required running time by the studios. The shorter the film, the more viewing sessions the film has.

Based on fan speculation, test audience feedback, and certain confirmed details concerning the film -- the deleted and/or extended scenes include:

-The original opening was a flashback of Carrie as a little girl spying through a fence on a female neighbor who is sunbathing. The young woman notices Carrie and starts to make conversation with her. Carrie tells her that she can see her "dirty pillows" and the neighbor explains to her that it is normal for women to develop breasts when they get older. That's when Margaret White appears and snatches up Carrie, screaming and yelling at the neighbor. She calls the young lady a whore, telling her to stay away from her child, and Carrie gets upset and begins to cry. Suddenly, it starts hailing. Pellets of ice come down on top of Carrie's home while Margaret runs into the house trying to console her daughter. The neighbor just stares in disbelief as the hail rains down on the White residence, and only the White residence.

-The White Commission [The film had integrated several courtroom scenes with witnesses giving testimonies of their experiences with Carrie White leading to the prom incident, essentially structuring the film as a series of flashbacks and recollections. The neighbor from the alternate opening scene is shown at first, now an adult woman, recounting her experience. There is also a scene featuring a TK Specialist discussing telekinesis and saying something to the effect of Carrie being one of many people who may be born with this genetic anomaly. It's been said that the White Commission scenes revealed too many prom survivors which the filmmaker's felt spoiled the climax]

-There was 'found footage' that played a role in the film. That's why you see Freddy 'Beak' Holt carrying his camera around and filming everything.

-There was more scenes detailing more in depth character development.

-There was more scenes involving school life, social media and bullying.

-"Wipe that smile off your face." - Chris to Carrie at the pool.

-Chris and Tina kiss [Extended]

-Scenes involving Facebook, the e-mail sent from Chris to Donna Kellogg. "So I'm out of prom and my [censored] father says he won't give them what they deserve."

-Billy's wild ride [The "blow--- scene" - similar to the 1976 version]

-An interaction between Chris and Carrie outside the dress shop.

-The confrontation between Sue and the mean girls

-Carrie levitates Margaret [Extended]

-Drive to the pig farm [Extended]

-After Tommy leaves the table to get some drinks, Carrie and Miss Desjardin have a friendly and meaningful conversation.

-Carrie and Tommy kiss.

-Billy kisses Chris.

-Margaret claws her way out of the closet and goes over to the sink where she retrieves a butcher knife and cuts herself.

-Sue tries to call Tommy from outside the school to warn him that something bad is about to happen. He rejects the call.

-The prom scene as a whole, which was said to be longer and more violent than the theatrical version.

-Tina on fire [Extended]

-A scene or shot which reveals George's and Erika's fate.

-There were some really creepy stuff that was unfortunately cut during post-production, like some "dancing" dead students. My source is not completely certain about this detail or its placement within the film. But it was either in a deleted scene where Carrie snaps the limbs of prom-goers or during the electrocution scene which was supposed to be more graphic and longer. In the novel, it was described as a "crazy puppet dance".

-The scene of Carrie levitating outside of the burning school was actually re-shot. In the original version of that scene, Carrie was standing in the centre of the lawn, waiting for the remaining students to come out of the burning school before telekinetically picking them off one by one.

-After Carrie leaves the school, she begins to destroy part of the town by causing explosions, bringing down power lines as she follows Billy and Chris. You can see a few seconds of it from the aerial view. If you look behind Carrie, you can see that several cars are in flames.

-When Sue is outside the school with Miss Desjardin, she sees Tommy's body being carried out on a stretcher. Miss Desjardin tells Sue that she's sorry and Sue walks away with determination to find Carrie.

-Margaret's original death scene - possibly similar to the book version which depicts a heart attack caused by Carrie's power.

-The multiple endings

1) The first ending is very similar to the ending of the 1976 film but without the final twist: Sue Snell actually gets killed when Carrie pulls her into the ground.

2) The second ending is an exact replica of the original film where Snell gets pulled into the ground by Carrie but wakes up in her bed to find it's just a dream.

3) The third ending is after Carrie saves Sue by pushing her out of the house, which collapses from the falling stones. There's a bird's eye view of the wreckage of what used to be Carrie's home before we get a quick CGI zoom through a pit of debris, to a close-up of a now bloodied Carrie snapping her eyes open.

4) The fourth ending is of Sue making a final speech to the court where she says the line heard in the teaser trailer about Carrie being just a girl, not a monster. This is spoken over scenes of Sue and her family visiting the cemetery. Sue goes to Carrie's grave, which shows the headstone tagged up and vandalized. She leaves her flowers and just walks away. Nothing scary, just a very somber closing shot of the headstone.

5) The fifth ending is after Carrie's house is destroyed by the falling stones, the movie flashes forward to several months later. We see Sue in the hospital surrounded by doctors and nurses, ready to give birth. They're trying to calm her down but Sue begins to struggle, saying she feels something is wrong. Suddenly, a very bloody hand (covered in afterbirth) erupts from between Sue's legs, reaching up and gripping her arm. She screams in terror and we see that she is having a nightmare, being held down by her parents while the camera pans over to a wall where we are shown a large crucifix hanging in her room.

6) The sixth ending is described as a "morning after voice over" by Sue Snell as we see the town coping with what happened.

7) The seventh ending shows the town the morning after Carrie's attack filled with news crews, reporters, and cops talking about the whole thing. What's bizarre about this scene is that Carrie's destruction of the city is being described as "a conspiracy." Apparently the town is "trying to cover up what really happened."
 

Nikkita

Active member
Joined
October 2, 2012
Posts
1,212
Location
Izmir,Turkey
I watched it LONG ago but forgot to say stuff about it in here :D
The original film was much much better,this was more like a gore teenage movie but the 1973 version was ''drama meets scary'' and i think Chloe Moretz couldn't fill Sissy Spacek's shoes.She was not ''weird'' enough.It was so sad that we saw more effects and gore then Carrie's expressions in the prom scene.
The only good thing about the movie was Julianne Moore's amazing acting.
 

A-lister

Veteran
Joined
December 28, 2009
Posts
32,843
Saw it, it was alright I guess... sorta reminded me of this one though:

MV5BMTMwNzMwNjUyNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzk3MTE3NA@@._V1_SY317_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg
 

Leydan

Worldvision Mod
Staff member
Joined
March 1, 2013
Posts
18,301
Location
UK
It looks scary.

Nah it's not scary at all. The bit where shes killing all her bullies at the school prom is pretty good though.
 
Top Bottom