Yes, I hate him (or rather: I hate his song and the way he 'sings'. Not him as a person lol). I've elaborated on my dislike for "If I were sorry" well enough in this thread so I don't know what else I could add really? I think it's an utterly worthless song that borrows heavily a better (but still pretty whatever) song, tells a pointless story ("These are all the things I'd do if I were sorry but I'm not sorry :smug:" then why mention them you blowhard twat???) and that accent is an affront to the face of mankind. :-)
Also, objectively rating music is impossible and any attempts to do so are stupid. It would come down to some soulless number-crunching, when the rating of something subjective such as personal enjoyment is always better off when done intuitively. Besides, if you give all different parametres, such as song, vocals, staging, etc a number out of five, you're still being subjective because what constitutes as a five for you might be a two for me, or vice versa.
ALSO ALSO, the 'objectively best' is always the winner. Always. The proof? It's in the results. They beat the others, hence they're the best. Period. You have the right to disagree, which is subjective , yes and perfectly valid. Subjectivity is your own free will and opinions making grounds here and that's positive.
ALSO ALSO ALSO, sustainability and chart viability are terrible quality gages in my opinion, and here's why
First of all, Eurovision does NOT equal the charts, it's a live performance contest. It's not the same environment, and you cannot treat it like one. Besides, most of these songs aren't ultratop material anyway, let's face it. (even the ones that SOUND like they could, such as "Chameleon" and "Truth")
Secondly, a chartable, radio-friendly song is actually LESS special and interesting by default than a chartable one (unless it's a universal smash hit, like "Euphoria", "Arcade" or "City lights"). I could turn my radio on and flip through the stations and I'd hear three She Got Mes or Tonight Agains in the span of 15 minutes, and they would all pass me by without notice, because you know, most songs sound like that nowadays. They're chartable because they are pedestrian and inoffensive, not the other way around.
Thirdly, many of the chartable songs are terrible? Do you like every song that gets radio airplay? And if you do, do you like them because you like them or because you think you are expected to like them?
Fourthly, the music industry decides which songs are released as singles (the ones which aren't written by the singers themselves usually bounce around as demos until an artist is willing to take it on), as do the radio DJ's themselves, meaning that if you blindly follow the charts, your taste is basically dictated by other people's taste, which cancels your free will.
And I pretty much oppose all of that because I want to exercise my right of free will when making my ranking decisions and I think the juries should be given the same unrestrictive liberties. Subjectivity > Objectivity when rating enjoyment. No exceptions.