Yes it seems that Poland is the big looser of this year.
Their entry would be 5th with the system 1998-2008 and 7th with the system 2009-2012.
But now? Only 14th place !
The worst systemeverAnd they would have been 23rd using the system from 1975 - 1996
And they would have been 23rd using the system from 1975 - 1996
1.Austria 302
2.Netherlands 230
3.Sweden 200
4.Αrmenia 185
5.Hungary 118
6.Russia 107
7.Poland 103
8.Romania 96
9.Ukraine 95
10.Finland 69
11.Νοrway 66
12.Denmark 62
13.Αzerbaijan 58
14.Switzerland 55
15.Μalta 52
16.Belarus 51
17.Spain 48
18.Ιceland 45
19.Germany 42
20.Montenegro 42
21.UK 38
22.Greece 33
23.Ιtaly 28
24.Slovenia 9
25.San Marino 9
26.France 3
Maybe we should get back to the Old jury voting and acknowledge the fact that Conchita and Poland have a better score then.
The question shouldn't be a maybe, if EBU insists on keeping this awful system yet another year, they just spit in the faces of the public.
It HAS to get back to the previous system IF they are to keep the juries as the juries are now. It just can't be that the juries can totally leave an entry with 0 even if it wins the televote, and we see now that the juries are using the new system to manipulate the outcome, not to vote for the best music.
Poland with 100% televoting would have been 5th.
With the 50-50 system (2009-2012) would have been 7th.
But with the new 50-50 system,they are 14th.
But look at the other side also.
Malta with the previous 50-50 system would have been 15th,only by juries !
Now? 23rd !
Azerbaijan with the previous 50-50 system would have been 13rd !
Now? 22nd!
Don't you think it's less democratic, Laleh?
Broadcasters get a lot of revenue from the televotes, and yet they allow juries to eliminate the impact of the top "selling" songs...... It's fine if lower scores from 5 to 1 get cut by juries, but the to eliminate the big points from the audience is slap in the face imho