A-lister
Veteran
- Joined
- December 28, 2009
- Posts
- 32,825
It's all a matter of taste and the judging criteria. Jury has every right to rank this song last based on their criteria/taste.
For me, it's not the worst entry out of the 41 but it's one of the bottoms for me, so I am not surprised if the juries were turned off by the overall presentation of the entry. This song is actually just as divisive as Iceland's, so I am surprised Iceland did much better than Portugal's. But then Iceland's entry/act is more about the message rather than the "song", so I can see people getting blinded by the message Hatari stands for rather than that atrocious of a "song".
As for the rest of the bad-performing songs (like Croatia/Montenegro/Moldova/Latvia etc), at least their presentations do not turn people off or left a bitter taste while watching them. They are just sub-par compared to the stronger entries in the competition.
If juries are put in ESC to support only safe , "non-divisive" , entries then ESC has (and it HAS) a huge credibility problem. We can clearly see that taking a risk is not paying off, playing it safe, sending something half-arsed, dated and generic is the way to go and then you will receive some jury love. Again, we are talking about people who are claimed to be "musical experts", they if anyone should see music from a little deeper point of view, but apparently they are even less open than the public. This is not about your or my taste, Portugal wasn't even in my personal top. 10 this year (it was in my top. 15 however), but objectively speaking this was adding far more to the contest than your average hopeless clichéd dated ballad so no, I don't agree with you that the juries handled this professionally, quite the opposite.