Re: KAZAKHSTAN 2020
About the geographical part - this is a discussion with multiple sides that I don't want to get into it. But historically??? Enlight me on this. When was (repectively how IS) Kazakstan a historic part of Europe? Just being part of the Russian empire does not count, because then Alaska would be also a historic part of Europe which is frankly ridiculous. Also the colonies or the new territories in the past were never seen as a part of Europe - with perhaps one single exception: Algeria.
The thing with Kazakhstan is that it was "not just being part of the Russian empire". Kazakhstan CHOSE to be part of it to prevent itself from becoming part of the Chinese hemisphere back in the 18th century. Unlike, colonies in North Africa, Kazakhstan was a vast country without any city life. It was the Russians who did found cities on Kazakh ground. You should visit Almaty. It's kinda like Kyiv or Yerevan. There's nothing "Asian" about it. It's the biggest city of the country by far and resembles the Kazakh mentality.
Also, the Kazakh people got heavily "russified". Even today, the most spoken language in the cities is Russian. Even people of Kazakh ethnicity speak Russian to each other. It's even very often the case that it's the mother tongue of Kazakh people, especially in the cities and in the Northern part of the country.
Demographically speaking, Kazakhstan is a very diverse country. Even nowadays, more than 1/4 of the country is European (I still think that Kazakh people are European AND Asian - as the country [geographically speaking]): Russians, Germans, Ukrainians, Tartars).
In Alaska, only 1% are of Russian descent (whilst we still have more than 20% Russians living in Kazakhstan) + it's not an independent country so that stating it as an argument isn't really fitting in this situation.
I would argue that New Zealand could also take part (if they want to) but unlike Kazakhstan they aren't geographically European and don't care about Eurovision at all whilst Kazakhstan desperately wants to compete.
Johan Engvall & Svante E. Cornell (Institute for Security and Development Policy) also argue that that Kazakhstan is not partly European based on geography but also on how the state has been created after independence: It is a secular country and share the same European views on the concept of nationality and citizenship.
I didn't argue that Kazakhstan should be seen as a "full" European country but it shares both - European and Asian - characteristics and features.
There's no point of letting Iceland (geographically speaking, partly American), Cyprus (geographically Asian; part is even occupied by an "Asian" country), Turkey (the huge majority of its territory is Asian), Azerbaijan, Israel, Armenia and Georgia participate but prevent Kazakhstan from taking part.