Who is even catty enough (or even has the time) to go through all these songs to try and find one that is ineligible. Snitches get stitches as the saying goes, calm it reporting entries for obscure sampling. 3 in 1 edition.
Who is even catty enough (or even has the time) to go through all these songs to try and find one that is ineligible. Snitches get stitches as the saying goes, calm it reporting entries for obscure sampling. 3 in 1 edition.
Thank you for accepting the new Swiss entry. I didn't know that my old entry had a sample of another song. All this is humiliating and shameful for me even though I accept the decision xsorry
I am not entirely sure what methods are used by the mods collecting the entries to check the eligibility and also if jurors really check their choices properly? In the US case, even I saw on the YT clip that it used another song released in 2017 which wasn't hard to find out as it was written blant in the description for the video (the original song was mentioned). Double check the release date and use the https://www.whosampled.com/ tool is a good start to avoid things like these happening, surely there are no guarantees but rules are rules no? I for one think it's good that songs that heavily "borrows" from already released songs are disqualified because they simply aren't original songs, but some sampling is allowed though (not entirely sure the criteria) but for instance in the Swiss case the main chorus was simply covering another song, surely that's not subtle? Will be interesting to see what's with the third case now...
I'm sure mods got alot to do so if someone finds this out I think it benefits the contest's credibility tbh, this "retaliation" attitude against whoever is finding this out is maybe not the best spirit I think though more should be done prior to avoid these scenarios, but hey one of my previous entries also got disqualified so it can happen to all of us, I learned from my "mistake" and checked more closely the next time.
Thank you for accepting the new Swiss entry. I didn't know that my old entry had a sample of another song. All this is humiliating and shameful for me even though I accept the decision xsorry
Honestly, it isn't already easy to find both a song that I like and that is competitive but if I now have to check the authenticity whenever althought I don't always have the time, Idk if I'll still be able to participe in future editions.
I mean, if its blatantly obvious it breaks the rules then yes but I've never been a huge fan of the level of strictness - I even addressed this in my previous post that was then ignored. But it leaves a bad taste in my mouth that people are seeking out ways to disqualify songs, someone even tried to get one of my entries disqualified over a single day because it apparently got played on some obscure radio at one point just outside the eligibility time frame and before its release date. It's good things are kept in check, but the pettiness of it with some songs is quite tiresome. Besides, we can't blame the people sending the entries always because you can't always tell the sampling is there. I never notice it usually. anyway, lets try not to make a huge deal of this. It's not like I care so very deeply for this issue, just think it's rather petty.
Omg Luca, this edition got even hotter.
This strict sample rule of FSC's has never been one of my favourites tbh. So many songs I could have send that relied on samples and it doesn't make songs less original at all (in my opinion) :/
I don't think someone is purposely "seeking out", as for the Swiss entry I personally knew this was a cover/sample since I already knew the original song (I'm a fan of the original artist, in fact I once sent an entry by her to the FSC). Of course it's impossible for us to know all songs released but I don't think it's out of "pettiness" if someone who already knew the original in forehand mentions this to the respective mod. Of course, if someone purposely "seeks out" (as you put it) then yeah, I could agree with you, but do you really think people in this contest have such petty intentions?
Yes I do think some have petty intentions. Not everyone who reports a song obviously. I mean, I did it once over a song that was in an esc NF but that was reported multiple times I believe. With my example above (which I think was petty and was done as it was a big hit), I also had someone report another entry because the main credited British artist didnt sing - despite it being his song 100% and him the main credited artist. in both those occasions the mods made the right decision but I think reporting a song and trying to disqualify it for such small nit picky things on a technicality is ridiculous. It's probably not the only occasions it happened either, I just know from my own.