This reminds me, when I first read a couple of your posts (probably during the last ESC season) I thought you were some kind of a jerk lol.
Ha ha ha I can't blame you. I'm opinionated and brutally honest. But when people get to know me they find that the first impression they had of me are...
actually completely true um abort convo abort abort ctrl alt delete ABORT.
It's also partially habit, at least for me. I've posted on message boards since 2008 and the ESCUnited forum is the most kind-hearted of them all by some margin. I really had to learn to stand up for myself and what I believe in. You live and you learn.
But yeah, often people do tend to be quite assertive about their opinions and biases, and I think the competitive aspect of Eurovision amplifies this even more - it pretty much invites you to argue over which song is the best or "deserves" a high place/pass to the final/whatever.
Certainly. I am always upset when Europe rejects my babies. :'( "Cake to bake" and "Työllki Ellää" are harmless and deserve love you heartless ghouls!! ;__;
I've personally largely managed to move past it when discussing music (especially since in the past, I did often fall into this to the point that makes me cringe now*) and well, it's a given that if a song doesn't appeal to me it's still likely to have an audience that appreciates it. It's also partially why I've never been fond of turning music or other creative arts into sports-like contests or awarding the supposed "best" - it's inevitably subjective and it's after all impossible to "measure" the quality of songs objectively the same way as you would a race or who threw something the furthest.
My preshow favourite entry has either NQ'd or done worse than expected every year since i started following the preshow except for last year ("Sebi" reaching 11th in the televote
33333333 so proud of them). It happens.
The casual audience doesn't think as deeply as we do. They either *get it* (within the first 10 seconds) or they don't, ever. This is why songs like "Telemóveis" were almost universally adored by fans, while the casuals had no clue what the fuck was going on (
)
As for rewarding the "best", this is always impossible. The enjoyment of music is 100% subjective. You could try some sort of pseudo-objective evaluation by marking points, but an intuitive ranking will always be more wholesome. The jury vote as it stands is a good example of this. It doesn't reward the best, but the lowest common denominator. Because it takes into account the whole ranking of each individual juror, it de facto rewards the entry that possesses the fewest flaws. (which is a different beast than the televote. You can't vote songs
out of Eurovision. Just imagine if you could. Russia NQ'ing every year
33)
*when I joined the first English forum in like 2004, I basically ended up telling people off simply for liking Hoobastank or Ashlee Simpson and stuff like that. I remember I legitimately couldn't comprehend that people didn't feel the same way about music than I did.
Same. Oh well, natural selection will take care of those.