Contact us

EBU Statement: Irregular voting patterns during Second Semi-Final 2022

FilipFromSweden

Well-known member
Joined
March 27, 2012
Posts
6,658
I doubt the EBU said something like that, but it's strange Sweden got so many extra points due the replaced votes. Not everything is based on Sweden-hate.

Literally everything is based on Sweden-hate. Why is it strange? Do you just not understand EBU’s algorithm or what? It’s not like Sweden was ranked 15th by the juries and their points came out of nowhere. Besides, the UK won the jury vote so there’s that
 

mup

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2021
Posts
289
Literally everything is based on Sweden-hate. Why is it strange? Do you just not understand EBU’s algorithm or what? It’s not like Sweden was ranked 15th by the juries and their points came out of nowhere. Besides, the UK won the jury vote so there’s that
:se: gets too much hate. :( Expect even more in the forthcoming years - I fear - now that the EBU's Executive Supervisor is a Swede.
 

Grinch

Well-known member
Joined
March 13, 2011
Posts
9,227
Here's a suggestion:

:1: Let's cancel all the jury votes and televotes
:2: Announce :se: as the winner of next 10 eurovisions with 62829 points
:3: Save time & money xheart
 

ESC_12 points

Active member
Joined
May 16, 2022
Posts
30
If the EBU has investigated the case with valid evidence and proof, then I am agree to disqualify all the six countries from the ESC. I do not support cheaters. They should take a rest at least one year.

Still not explaining how "irregular voting pattern" in SF2 justifies changing countries' totally regular votes in the Final.
Why the EBU did not have "bad connection" on the SF2 but in the Final?
Why the EBU not just cancelled their Final voting by saying that there was "bad connection", thus their votes will be not counted, but instead they decided to give Georgian and Azerbaijani 12 points to the UK, and Romanian and Polish to Ukraine.
Why the EBU not let Georgia, Azerbaijan and Romania to go live but allowed it to Poland and San Marino?
Why the EBU did not had "bad connection" also with Greece Cyprus point exchange?
All the actions of the EBU will make sence when we see who willl host the ESC next year....

Anyway, I asked a lot of questions.... I better go and watch Gentlemen Jack season 2 now.
 

Gitte

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
439
Location
Belgium
If the EBU has investigated the case with valid evidence and proof, then I am agree to disqualify all the six countries from the ESC. I do not support cheaters. They should take a rest at least one year.

Still not explaining how "irregular voting pattern" in SF2 justifies changing countries' totally regular votes in the Final.
Why the EBU did not have "bad connection" on the SF2 but in the Final?
Why the EBU not just cancelled their Final voting by saying that there was "bad connection", thus their votes will be not counted, but instead they decided to give Georgian and Azerbaijani 12 points to the UK, and Romanian and Polish to Ukraine.
Why the EBU not let Georgia, Azerbaijan and Romania to go live but allowed it to Poland and San Marino?
Why the EBU did not had "bad connection" also with Greece Cyprus point exchange?
All the actions of the EBU will make sence when we see who willl host the ESC next year....

Anyway, I asked a lot of questions.... I better go and watch Gentlemen Jack season 2 now.
1) In the semi final there isn't a spokesperson who announces the point. The presenters do so, so no need for a bad connection, and the cheated votes didn't change the qualifiers anyway
2) this is decided by the algorithm
3) I read that they asked the spokespersons/broadcasters to announce the algorithm points, those who didn't agree had a 'bad connection' (less awkward than the spokesperson saying their unchanged 12 points, with martin interrupting them and going 'no no they cheated, 12 points go to x')
4) greece-cyprus is basic block voting that happens every year, no weird irregularity with 6 mostly unrelated countries suddenly scoring each other's mostly unpopular songs high
 

SarahM

Active member
Joined
February 21, 2022
Posts
80
Proud that our strength always lies in televoting :it:
IMO televoting is great but Jury voting is still needed to help entries with more contemplative ballads, songs performing earlier on in the show, countries who do not have many neighbours to vote for them, etc. Televoting often favours the more lively, fun songs. It's good to maintain a balance of the types of entries in the competition.

Double posting my recommendation to watch the video by ESC Tom regarding the semi final 2 cheating if you have time, I found it interesting - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d5NZ3_GiV8
 
Last edited:

midnightsun

Veteran
Joined
February 26, 2016
Posts
3,927
Location
Germany
Juries are even worse (more predictable, more easy to manipulate) that televoters.
However, we do have to keep them, otherwise we will have another blockvoting domination. The jury itself should be replaced though. 5 members are too few (in pre televoting times the jury consisted of ten at least iirc). There should be an international jury with people from all nations, not only from their own country. Why not a jury consisting of one member of each of all 40 (circa) participants?
 

dixenborg

Active member
Joined
May 15, 2022
Posts
60
I think calling the different juries with their votes and the iconic twelve points/douze points is an important and iconic part of the contest which I wouldn’t want to lose.

I do think five members is too small. Maybe you could have five professionals and five members of the public or even a larger demoscopic jury as well as the experts. I appreciate this might be more complex for broadcasters but five is too few with too much influence.
 

mitch67

Active member
Joined
March 13, 2022
Posts
89
Location
Düsseldorf
even if it is just five, in order to have a proper jury casting its vote and not some algoryhtms, after one found out about irrgeluarities, maybe it is good to have at least one substitute jury.. and keep names to yourself , so they cannot be bribed...

besides: even televote only was giving each participant the chance to announce the "douze point", before splitting up they got to give away 8, 10 and 12 points..
 
Last edited:

hijirio

Veteran
Joined
April 25, 2012
Posts
6,275
Location
Gay
Sweden’s jury points in the semi:

:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 10
:be: Belgium 8
:mt: Malta 7

Sweden got from these countries:
:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 12
:be: Belgium 10
:mt: Malta 12

but EBU will never have the balls to warn or ban Sweden xqueenbitch
 

Gitte

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
439
Location
Belgium
Sweden’s jury points in the semi:

:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 10
:be: Belgium 8
:mt: Malta 7

Sweden got from these countries:
:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 12
:be: Belgium 10
:mt: Malta 12

but EBU will never have the balls to warn or ban Sweden xqueenbitch
except that it gets high points from nearly all countries anyway and it's a song that everyone knew is jury friendly beforehand by it's structure. It's also not exactly weird it gives points to Australia and Estonia in particular. Belgium and Malta are less great but still radio-friendly, something the juries historically somewhat like.

If the known irregulality was Poland and Azerbaijan mainly getting a lot of jury points and giving 12's to each other, no alarmbells would ring off because guess what? It are very jury friendly songs. The problem is particularly that they also gave countries like Georgia and San Marino high scores, which have very little redeeming qualities for the jury.
 

SarahM

Active member
Joined
February 21, 2022
Posts
80
Sweden’s jury points in the semi:

:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 10
:be: Belgium 8
:mt: Malta 7

Sweden got from these countries:
:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 12
:be: Belgium 10
:mt: Malta 12

but EBU will never have the balls to warn or ban Sweden xqueenbitch
I too would echo Gitte's comments. My reaction to your theory that the Swedish juries may have cheated:

#1 - Sweden was a hot favourite to win overall (and won this semi) so it's not shocking that they got 12 points from some countries, it's a jury friendly song which was professionally packaged.
#2 - Estonia's entry was quite popular, IMO had a very Scandi sound to it.
#3 - Belgium and Malta both were well packaged and highly produced, good vocalists. I could see how a jury may award these entries points even if they were not my favorites.
#4 - It could be possible that Swedish juries contacted Australia, Estonia, Belgium and Malta to arrange a points swap (I don't think this is the case). If they did, the EBU would have a hard time proving this, and so it would not be worth accusing these countries of cheating. In the case of the 6 that did cheat, it was done so in a very obvious way and the EBU were right to make examples of them.
 

Kaz

Well-known member
Joined
January 12, 2014
Posts
2,082
Sweden’s jury points in the semi:

:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 10
:be: Belgium 8
:mt: Malta 7

Sweden got from these countries:
:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 12
:be: Belgium 10
:mt: Malta 12

but EBU will never have the balls to warn or ban Sweden xqueenbitch

In semi 2, Sweden received more sets of jury 12 points than any song in history. In fact, Belgium was one of only 4 (FOUR!) national juries who did NOT give Sweden 12 points in the semi final. This alone should disprove any idea of a shady alliance here.

Also, Belgium was one of the first countries to report about the jury corruption. Why would their national broadcaster write about the jury corrruption if they were scared about being investigated themselves?
 

HarryUK

Well-known member
Joined
April 12, 2014
Posts
3,709
Location
New York
Sweden’s jury points in the semi:

:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 10
:be: Belgium 8
:mt: Malta 7

Sweden got from these countries:
:au: Australia 12
:ee: Estonia 12
:be: Belgium 10
:mt: Malta 12

but EBU will never have the balls to warn or ban Sweden xqueenbitch
Sweden wiped the floor in SF2. They did not need a voting pact
 

nofuxCZ

Well-known member
Joined
January 8, 2012
Posts
6,224
Location
Czech Republic / Biflovatia
I agree with the idea that, in case of rigged jury voting, the best is doubling the televote.
Before 2016, if a jury result was deemed invalid, only televotes would be used. It happened in 2015 when the jury votes of Montenegro and North Macedonia were not accepted and only the televotes were used to calculate the points.

From 2016 onwards they changed the rules:
What if a country cannot deliver a valid jury result?
In order to secure the 50/50 balance between jury and televoting, a national televoting result can’t be used as backup result for the jury. Therefore, if – for whatever reason – a country cannot deliver a valid jury result, a substitute result is calculated by the jury result of a pre-selected group of countries.

I agree they should be doubling the televotes, that at least has some basis in reality as opposed to the arbitrary aggregated scores.
 

Synergise

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Posts
1,709
Location
United Kingdom
For those that might be interested, I decided to look at each country's jury results in the final and work out what their aggregated jury result would have been if they had also had their results replaced. I've relied on two assumptions:

1 - Results from the Big 5 are based on the other Big 5 countries (i.e. they act as a 'big 5' pot). We don't know if this is actually the case.
2 - The results from pot 3 are based on the combined results of the two remaining countries in the pot. I believe this wouldn't be the case as it seems that the EBU used a 3 country minimum for the semi-finals. However, since we don't know what additional countries would be used for Armenia/Israel/Ukraine, I've stuck to using the two other countries from their pot.

The results for each country are on the google sheet below:


To clarify, these would not be the results if EVERY country had their jury vote replaced. Rather, each country's column shows what their jury result would have been if they were the only other country to have their jury vote replaced. For example, if France had also had their jury vote excluded alongside the other 6 countries, their 12 points would have gone to Sweden, 10 to UK, 8 to Azerbaijan etc.

Obviously this system creates more extremes, with many more countries picking up 0 jury votes overall from this, and the UK/Sweden/Spain picking up points from every country bar one.
 
Top Bottom